Archive for September, 2007

County computers

Friday, September 28th, 2007

I hear they just busted Michelle for using county computers to send false emails. Of course they won’t do anything to her. Incidentally she also sent her new email address to the Pollard’s attorney. Yes she had the — well you know what — to send emails directly to their lawyer using a fake name and anonymous email address. Seems that when she changed her regular email address to “myvette77…” (no I’m not mean enough to give it out publicly — I have a conscience) she sent an automated update to everyone in her address book — including the ones she sent the anonymous email messages to. The email she sent the lawyer, which came from the “tinkerbell.co.pitt” web server says just horrible things about Stacey’s mother. Barbara Pollard is one of the sweetest ladies you will ever meet. The Pollard’s lawyer knew it was Michelle and sent back a response (pretending he was responding to the fake person) and said Michelle was getting ready to be arrested. Recently, Mac’s lawyer threatened to use the lawyer’s email to the “fake person” {Michelle} to show misconduct by the lawyer, which it is not. Seems Mac’s lawyers took the same bait Michelle did. Do you see? By referring to the email that Michelle sent anonymously they have confirmed not only that it was Michelle but also that Mac and her are still in the cover-up because Mac’s lawyer has it. Oh the Pollard’s lawyer tried to get the DA to look at these emails and gave him the ip address and web server info a couple months ago. He didn’t want it. Has that changed now???

Legal Happenings………………….

Thursday, September 27th, 2007

Just this week all the lawyers for the dark side filed papers objecting to the amendment of the complaint. In better than 90% of cases, amendments are not even opposed because the courts almost always grant them. WHY WHY WHY WHY ARE THEY FIGHTING SO HARD TO KEEP THE AMENDED COMPLAINT FROM THE COURT????????????????????
Could it be:
A. Their motion has a good chance of being granted and is therefore a good use of taxpayer money for legal expenses; or
B. Their attorneys are just bored and looking for something to do in their spare time; or
C. They are worried that they will have to admit or deny the allegations in the amended complaint and since they have already discussed the amended complaint with their clients, it scares the bejeesus out of them.

Will we ever know the truth??

Friday, September 21st, 2007

1. Stacey is dead
2. Michelle flunked lie detector and says she pushed epileptic in pool in 38 degree weather
3. Judge her character for yourself — Can you believe anything she says
4. Mac promotes her and keeps her employed after going topless in public after he went to the wall to shut down all the topless bars — obviously there is a “special relationship” between our sheriff and Michelle because anyone else would be long fired
5. Case is under review by medical examiner, SBI and DA
6. If you’re objective at all you can see that no real investigation was done until after the family filed this suit(i.e. A COVER-UP)
7. Michelle got a lot of insurance money and real property out of Stacey’s death

CASE AGAINST MICHELLE STILL HAS TO BE TRIED AND WILL WE EVER KNOW WHAT TRULY HAPPENED BACK IN NOVEMBER OF 2005? THATS THE CASE AGAINST THE SHERIFF.

WE KNOW THAT A LOT OF SUBPOENAS HAVE BEEN ISSUED BY THE DA AND THAT THE SBI HAS BEEN ACTIVE LATELY. HAVE YOU HEARD ANYTHING LATELY?? STAY TUNED!!!!!!!!!!

Legal Developments

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

Did you know that Sheriff Manning let Lt. Pollard be directly involved in the investigation of her own husband’s death? Look at the recently filed second amended complaint. Wonder why he determined nothing was wrong!!!!! Look to the right under “read the complaints”

To save time look for the bold portions — it is kind of long — and tell us what you think.

The Federal Court is reviewing the matter right now.

Taxpayer Concerns

Tuesday, September 4th, 2007

You know Inv. Paula Dance was suspended for allegedly sending information about this case to the lawyer for the Pollards — which she didn’t even do. Unless Mac intended to deny the evidence existed (there is something called “discovery” where they have to give it to the other side anyway) why the big stink??? They made up some phony policy and then got scared about how bad it looked — what with Michelle showing her … umm … “headlights.” So they have suspended Michelle for a whole week and demoted her. BTW — does anyone know if she got to keep her salary with the demotion?????

All that to say this. He better not fire anyone else ever, because if they get a lawyer who sees what Michelle got away with there are going to be so many lawsuits that the County won’t be able to get insurance. And promotions … a woman who doesn’t sleep around has a claim that she didn’t get promoted because she didn’t sleep with her superiors. See where I’m going. Michelle is the bar and anyone whose misconduct doesn’t measure up to hers better not get more than one week’s suspension or the lawyers will start circling. And that’s why the boss isn’t supposed to sleep with the help. Then you can’t get rid of the deadwood.

Daily Reflector Autopsy Article Sept. 2, 2007

Sunday, September 2nd, 2007

FYI….. The Daily Reflector contacted the attorney for the family Friday afternoon around 4pm and stated he was doing an article this weekend on the case. The affidavit by Dr. Gilliland had been requested before any contact with the reporter because the response to Lt. Pollard’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit was due soon. The reporter asked for a comment on the allegations in Lt. Pollard’s Motion to Dismiss that the family had not be prejudiced by the way the case had been handled by law enforcement. While the reporter was on the phone with the family’s attorney, Dr. Gilliland’s affidavit was delivered and the reporter asked for a copy. Since the response to the motion (with the affidavit attached) is required to be published online with the Federal Court (and anyone who wants to see any filing in Federal Court can go to the court’s website to view them) the affidavit was provided to the reporter. For those who may not have read the article or the affidavit, it simply says that the medical examiners office is reviewing the cause of Stacey’s death because of information they received after the suit was filed and that a final determination of the cause of Stacey’s death will not be made until the evidence at the SBI lab has been analyzed and the medical examiner gets to review it. And that is exactly what should have happen. The reason the affidavit is important is that it shows that Stacey’s death is FINALLY being investigated. In fact most of the evidence being reviewed by the SBI lab was collected the night Stacey died BUT WAS NEVER SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS. Our “prejudice” is that we don’t even know what the final determination of cause of death will be and the statute of limitations for filing a wrongful death case will run out in about 75 days. If the family had waited for the authorities to do something, the statute would have run out (meaning no case against Michelle could have ever been filed)and no real investigation would have ever been done. Wonder if that was their plan? In any event, it appears that the filing of the suit and the many responses to this website have succeeded - to an extent at least - in getting the case looked at by those in official capacities………..btw………is Inv. Dance still suspended?????????????